Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Ava Markham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Markham analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Ava Markham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Markham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.45% of points on his second serve, while Markham has won 46.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 57.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Markham has won 53.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.84% and 36.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 53.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Markham has saved 43.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 56.72% of matches played (W/L 38/ 29), with Markham winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 153/ 94), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Markham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 26/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 23), where as Markham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Markham winning 0. The last match between Chirico and Markham was at the W75 Rome, 31-01-2024, First, I.hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Markham have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Markham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Markham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.55 while Markham has played against players with an average rank of 212.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Markham has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 50.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Markham has converted 41.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
209
Rank
58
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
618
Rank
597
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
56% (301-233)
Career Total W/L
58% (33-24)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
44% (4-5)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ava Markham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (30/49) | 54% (27/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 59% (16/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (25/50) | 29% (14/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ava Markham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 44% (4/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (40/29) | 44% (8/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (357/314) | 48% (83/91) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (17/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:45 | 1:35:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 209.68 | 336.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1429/2291) | 58% (314/539) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (875/1429) | 60% (189/314) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (409/862) | 46% (104/225) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (140/277) | 41% (29/70) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1038/2234) | 43% (247/575) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (18/12) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 44% (4/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (5/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Federica Urgesi
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Louisa Chirico
58%
(
71 of
123)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
4
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
61 of
126)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Unknown Player
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kayla Day
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ava Markham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Ava Markham
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Daria Lodikova
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Ava Markham
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ava Markham
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Jenna Defalco
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Adesuwa Osabuohien
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
49%
(
23 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Ava Markham
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Elina Nepliy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ava Markham
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Markham Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Louisa Chirico
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
